Evaluation Of "Taste Of Madness"
Ensemble Evaluation
As an ensemble something that we did that was rather effective was that the movement we did through the story telling of Artaud was very effective in both performance because we just went for it , Therefore, it looked engaging to look at and it made the audience feel something, for example I heard one of the audience member next to me say "wow" as they were watching the movement , however, something that we could have done better was that we faced away from the audience as we did it , moreover, this killed the vibe of appearance a bit because we closed ourselves off from the audience , resulting into them not having the full experience that they could have had.I strongly believe that the second show that we did was extremely better than the first because we let go more and just went for it, this was beneficial for our performance to let go and have fun because that the main aim of our performance it was mostly all about fun and playfulness through the physical movements we did and emotional reefing.
The emotional reefing and animalistic vibe we brought to the piece is something that I feel work then most out of everything we did in the piece because it was very strange because as humans we tend to become more restricted through the emotions that we let out for people to see, however, through this performance we were very lose and expressed a lot through our physicality and how much we just went for it.
In experimental theatre things tend to always change and you have to always think on your feet, for example, one of the groups had to move out their space and create the same capacity of work in a different space in a short space of time and I think as an ensemble we worked very well with change, another example of change that happen was that , throughout the duration of the first show my little section of Fifi and I was skipped by mistake and even when the ensemble noticed they missed something they carried on and didn't let on to the audience that there was a problem at all, therefore, I think this was effective of us because we read the space and the problem that accorded and how we could of fixed it without breaking character and the idea of the bar and the concept of Tom waits.
A strength in contribution to the piece is that I really went for it because as we start the rehearsal process I wasn't really sure how everything would have worked out but by me just going along with it and contribution when I could , helped me as an actor to always think about what the ending process was going to look like but to just trust in what I was doing and be 100% committed to the ensemble as well as the piece that we were creating, Another strength that the whole company had was that when we did the ending piece all together the level of comment was really good because even after we had all do our main performance and came to the space to do the ending bit, We all were still in performance zone and the level of performance didn't drop at all, it was consistent throughout the two shows, this was an effective attribute to possess because as our energy raised so did the audiences energy to understand and watch our piece and actually take something from it.
A strength that helped to make the performance successful was the lighting used in our piece, I believe that it added a effective vibe to our piece and I strongly believe the idea of the colour helped us to express the ideas of emotions for example when the light was turned red for lust , you could see the physical movements on the blocks were more effective than in rehearsal when we weren't using the lights for effective, the lights imply that the staging of the piece helped us to bring it more to life for the audience to view.
A weakness that made our piece not as successful as it could of been was that when we came to the space the first time , the ensemble was talking and could be heared by the audience on the other side, which killed the aspect of surprise of the finale of the Theatre performance. The effect of this on the audience was that it made them not have the full impact of theatre that they could of had from our whole year ensemble piece, a way that the piece could have been made more effective was if we kept the idea of professionalism and concentration at the ending piece because if they could hear us it destroyed the aim of us hiding from them, however, I think a strength in the piece was when we were running round them in a circle because it made the audience feel trapped and enclosed , this helped to enforced the idea of mental health because mental health patients tend to feel closed off and lonely , therefore, the idea of trapping them in a circle was effective because it helped to create an atmosphere for them to experience.
I believe that the first performance of our promenade was not as good as the second one because we weren't as ready as we could of been, moreover, the audience came quicker than we through, and this resulted into us feeling like we had to rush through our street freak performance and this lost meaning to who we were trying to be. Something that we should try to do for next time is that we should be constantly aware of our surrounds and where the audience was and how long it would take time to reach us since, we knew the group before us had a location change and were much closer to us.
As my character of street freak master something I really needed to work on was projection because you couldn't always hear me and since we were in a outside environment sound tends to get lost very easily, however, the second performance vocal clarity and projection was increasingly better than the first, I think it was very effective to have two performances because the first performance helps us to know what we have to tighten up and how to make things more entertaining as a performance, in the first performance we skipped something and this help us to understand the duration of our performance and running order.
A major weakness concerning our promenade was that we could of had more physicality through bolder character choices because we were meant to be "odd freaky characters" and street freaks tend to have odd and intriguing physical stature but we kept to what we were use too , on the other hand a strength was also our physically at the start before we started our promenade because we were in interesting shapes before we began which made a audience members want to look and explore our characters for example, a man came up to us when he was walking past and just looked at us as we stayed there straight and without movement , I think this was an effective thing for our promenade because it is little communications, that tends to help the show come all together because you feel the piece is aimed straight at you and you take something from watching the piece of theatre.
The emotional reefing and animalistic vibe we brought to the piece is something that I feel work then most out of everything we did in the piece because it was very strange because as humans we tend to become more restricted through the emotions that we let out for people to see, however, through this performance we were very lose and expressed a lot through our physicality and how much we just went for it.
In experimental theatre things tend to always change and you have to always think on your feet, for example, one of the groups had to move out their space and create the same capacity of work in a different space in a short space of time and I think as an ensemble we worked very well with change, another example of change that happen was that , throughout the duration of the first show my little section of Fifi and I was skipped by mistake and even when the ensemble noticed they missed something they carried on and didn't let on to the audience that there was a problem at all, therefore, I think this was effective of us because we read the space and the problem that accorded and how we could of fixed it without breaking character and the idea of the bar and the concept of Tom waits.
A strength in contribution to the piece is that I really went for it because as we start the rehearsal process I wasn't really sure how everything would have worked out but by me just going along with it and contribution when I could , helped me as an actor to always think about what the ending process was going to look like but to just trust in what I was doing and be 100% committed to the ensemble as well as the piece that we were creating, Another strength that the whole company had was that when we did the ending piece all together the level of comment was really good because even after we had all do our main performance and came to the space to do the ending bit, We all were still in performance zone and the level of performance didn't drop at all, it was consistent throughout the two shows, this was an effective attribute to possess because as our energy raised so did the audiences energy to understand and watch our piece and actually take something from it.
A strength that helped to make the performance successful was the lighting used in our piece, I believe that it added a effective vibe to our piece and I strongly believe the idea of the colour helped us to express the ideas of emotions for example when the light was turned red for lust , you could see the physical movements on the blocks were more effective than in rehearsal when we weren't using the lights for effective, the lights imply that the staging of the piece helped us to bring it more to life for the audience to view.
A weakness that made our piece not as successful as it could of been was that when we came to the space the first time , the ensemble was talking and could be heared by the audience on the other side, which killed the aspect of surprise of the finale of the Theatre performance. The effect of this on the audience was that it made them not have the full impact of theatre that they could of had from our whole year ensemble piece, a way that the piece could have been made more effective was if we kept the idea of professionalism and concentration at the ending piece because if they could hear us it destroyed the aim of us hiding from them, however, I think a strength in the piece was when we were running round them in a circle because it made the audience feel trapped and enclosed , this helped to enforced the idea of mental health because mental health patients tend to feel closed off and lonely , therefore, the idea of trapping them in a circle was effective because it helped to create an atmosphere for them to experience.
Promenade Evaluation
I am convinced that the second performances Promenade was so much better because they reacted more to the street freaks charterers , the characters had more of an effect on them because the audience took the time to truly look at the street freaks and listen to what we were saying, Something that we did very well as freak freaks was that the audience had to walk past us to get to the start of the promenade and I think the way we just stood in our various space and didn't make a sound but just looked at them really added the essence of freakishness of our Promenade and how we were a bit weird.I believe that the first performance of our promenade was not as good as the second one because we weren't as ready as we could of been, moreover, the audience came quicker than we through, and this resulted into us feeling like we had to rush through our street freak performance and this lost meaning to who we were trying to be. Something that we should try to do for next time is that we should be constantly aware of our surrounds and where the audience was and how long it would take time to reach us since, we knew the group before us had a location change and were much closer to us.
As my character of street freak master something I really needed to work on was projection because you couldn't always hear me and since we were in a outside environment sound tends to get lost very easily, however, the second performance vocal clarity and projection was increasingly better than the first, I think it was very effective to have two performances because the first performance helps us to know what we have to tighten up and how to make things more entertaining as a performance, in the first performance we skipped something and this help us to understand the duration of our performance and running order.
A major weakness concerning our promenade was that we could of had more physicality through bolder character choices because we were meant to be "odd freaky characters" and street freaks tend to have odd and intriguing physical stature but we kept to what we were use too , on the other hand a strength was also our physically at the start before we started our promenade because we were in interesting shapes before we began which made a audience members want to look and explore our characters for example, a man came up to us when he was walking past and just looked at us as we stayed there straight and without movement , I think this was an effective thing for our promenade because it is little communications, that tends to help the show come all together because you feel the piece is aimed straight at you and you take something from watching the piece of theatre.





















